Re: Bug#877735: busybox: m68k build broken due to "-Os" in CFLAGS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 4:25 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
<glaubitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi!

On 10/05/2017 01:16 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:

Since busybox is very important to boot the system and get
debian-installer working, I would like to ask to have the
change from [1] reverted for m68k until we have fixed the
potential bug in gcc which most likely mis-compiled busybox.


On second thought, I would actually recommended to revert this change
for all architectures. Size isn't so much a constraint anymore these
days, you reduce the binary by about 200k. I don't think this is worth
the risk of breaking something as fundemantal as busybox.

Please exclude armel, which has size limitation on initrd of d-i [0].
Thanks!

[0] https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/debian-installer.git/tree/build/boot/arm/qnap-flash-debian#n13

Cheers,
-- 
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux