Hi Geert,
2017-01-04 18:27 GMT+09:00 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Hi Yamada-san,
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Some architectures are duplicating the definition of UL():
#define UL(x) _AC(x, UL)
This is not actually arch-specific, so it will be useful to move it
to a common header. Currently, we only have the uapi variant for
linux/const.h, so I am creating include/linux/const.h.
I am also adding _UL(x), _ULL(x), ULL(x) because _AC() is used for
UL in most places (and ULL in some places). I expect _AC(..., UL)
will be replaced with _UL(...) or UL(...). The underscore-prefixed
one should be used for exported headers.
Note:
I renamed UL(x) in arch/m68k/mm/init.c, where it is used for a
different meaning.
Shouldn't that be a separate (prerequisite) patch?
Yes, I did so in v2.
Thanks!
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
