On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Many of clk_disable() implementations just return for NULL pointer,
but this check is missing from some. Let's make it tree-wide
consistent. It will allow clock consumers to call clk_disable()
without NULL pointer check.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Wan Zongshun <mcuos.com@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
