Hi Arnd,
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 11:52 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
The rtc-generic driver provides an architecture specific
wrapper on top of the generic rtc_class_ops abstraction,
and m68k has another abstraction on top, which is a bit
silly.
This changes the m68k rtc-generic device to provide its
rtc_class_ops directly, to reduce the number of layers
by one.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
---
arch/m68k/kernel/time.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/m68k/kernel/time.c b/arch/m68k/kernel/time.c
index 3857737e3958..fe35890feede 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/time.c
@@ -86,7 +86,24 @@ void read_persistent_clock(struct timespec *ts)
}
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET
+#if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET) && defined(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_GENERIC)
s/defined/IS_ENABLED/ for the modular case.
@@ -95,7 +112,10 @@ static int __init rtc_init(void)
if (!mach_hwclk)
return -ENODEV;
- pdev = platform_device_register_simple("rtc-generic", -1, NULL, 0);
+ /* or just call devm_rtc_device_register instead? */
I guess this comment is a bogus leftover? There's no "dev" parameter to
pass to devm_rtc_device_register() here.
+ pdev = platform_device_register_data(NULL, "rtc-generic", -1,
+ &generic_rtc_ops,
+ sizeof(generic_rtc_ops));
return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(pdev);
}
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
