Hi Jeffrey,
CC linux-arch
On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Jeffrey Merkey <jeffmerkey@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This patch series adds an export which can be set by system debuggers to
direct the hard lockup and soft lockup detector to trigger a breakpoint
exception and enter a debugger if one is active. It is assumed that if
someone sets this variable, then an breakpoint handler of some sort will
be actively loaded or registered via the notify die handler chain.
This addition is extremely useful for debugging hard and soft lockups
real time and quickly from a console debugger.
As there's no cover letter, I'm giving my (mostly general) comments in a
reply to this patch.
Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Merkey <jeffmerkey@xxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/m68k/include/asm/kdebug.h | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 arch/m68k/include/asm/kdebug.h
diff --git a/arch/m68k/include/asm/kdebug.h b/arch/m68k/include/asm/kdebug.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..5d09de1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/m68k/include/asm/kdebug.h
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+
+static inline void arch_breakpoint(void)
+{
+}
No include guards in the newly added header files?
This new file will conflict with arch/m68k/include/asm/Kbuild, which has:
generic-y += kdebug.h
What about putting the dummy arch_breakpoint() in include/asm-generic/kdebug.h
instead, like
#ifndef arch_breakpoint
static inline void arch_breakpoint(void)
{
}
#endif
Architectures providing their own version have to #define arch_breakpoint.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
