On Sun, 2016-01-03 at 22:05 +0000, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 13:46:22 -0800
Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
(using an email address for James that shouldn't bounce)
On Sun, 2016-01-03 at 21:29 +0000, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
I would beg to differ. As a tool for understanding the
differences as you
step through the versions it's invaluable.
This removes intentional formatting that
makes reading comments easier.
And this matters at the end of the patch series because ?
It removes intentional formatting that makes
reading comments easier.
I'm missing something here - the final result of the merge is completely
and easily readable. Likewise I can work through it and review the code
and compare them for the platform I care about (Mac68K)
And diff -w still works just fine.
So you think 70+ patches should be redone because of that, when the end
result is a clean driver anyway ???
Nope, I think patch 69 should simply not be applied.
I don't know and don't care if patches 70 through 78
depend on any changes made by patch 69.
I'd expect no dependencies exist though.
It doesn't matter much in any case.
cheers, Joe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
