On Thursday 19 November 2015 16:18:43 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 12:25:45PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Thursday 19 November 2015 03:40:25 Chen Gang wrote:
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/page.h b/include/asm-generic/page.h
index 37d1fe2..67cfb7d 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/page.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/page.h
@@ -24,9 +24,6 @@
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
-#define get_user_page(vaddr) __get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL)
-#define free_user_page(page, addr) free_page(addr)
-
#define clear_page(page) memset((page), 0, PAGE_SIZE)
#define copy_page(to,from) memcpy((to), (from), PAGE_SIZE)
Looks good. I can take the asm-generic portion when you split it up, and
I can also help you merge the remaining patches in case some of
the arch maintainers fail to pick them up. I think all five of them
are actively maintained though, so the patches should just go through
the respective architecture trees.
Or we just ack the patch and have it go through one tree, which I think
is the most sensible. I can't imagine that there would be any major
conflicts here, surely no one is constantly changing their asm/page.h ?
Yes, good point, there is really very little potential for conflicts
here. I've applied it into my asm-generic tree for now, but will
revert it if we get regressions or NAKs.
For some reason, the patch was whitespace broken, but I managed to
extract it from the attachment.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
