Hi Andreas,
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
You mean that we should drop "select ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION",
but we can't do that because an indirect call through sys_ipc() would
still need it when dispatching to sys_{sem,shm,msg}ctl()?
Yes. But all architectures that currently use both sys_ipc and
ARCH_WANT_IPC_PARSE_VERSION would benefit from decoupling it when they
add the direct syscalls.
Do we currently have architectures that use both sys_ipc and the direct
syscalls, where keeping ipc_parse_version() in the direct syscalls is required?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
