Hi Finn,
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jun 2015, in which I wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
More magic values...
[...] The only useful RTC documentation I've ever come across is this:
http://mac.linux-m68k.org/devel/plushw.php
This document appears to be Inside Macintosh vol. III ch. 2. It describes
the early RTC chip that lacks two-byte operations and XPRAM, and pre-dates
all Mac hardware supported in mainline Linux. But it does offer some
useful data, though not enough to answer all of your criticisms (as I
said).
I understand.
[...] I think they should be applied across the entire file, and in a
different patch. Inconsistent use of such macros would be undesirable
IMHO.
So, unless you have other ideas, I will revise this patch and insert an
earlier patch to address existing code, and codify what little reliable
chip data we have.
Thanks!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
