@@ -667,22 +680,21 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_scan_one_pbm(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm,
pbm->busn.end = pbm->pci_last_busno;
pbm->busn.flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
pci_add_resource(&resources, &pbm->busn);
- bus = pci_create_root_bus(parent,
+ host = pci_scan_host_bridge(parent,
PCI_DOMBUS(pbm->index, pbm->pci_first_busno),
- pbm->pci_ops, pbm, &resources);
- if (!bus) {
- printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to create bus for %s\n",
+ pbm->pci_ops, pbm, &resources, &phb_ops);
+ if (!host) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to create host bridge for %s\n",
node->full_name);
pci_free_resource_list(&resources);
return NULL;
}
I would keep "bus" and set it here:
bus = host->bus;
That would remove some lines from your patch that really didn't change,
which makes it easier to see what actually *is* changing, namely, you're
removing the pci_of_scan_bus() call because it is now done inside
pci_scan_host_bridge().
Yes, keep it will make the code more clean, thanks!
- pci_of_scan_bus(pbm, node, bus);
- pci_bus_register_of_sysfs(bus);
+ pci_bus_register_of_sysfs(host->bus);
- pci_claim_bus_resources(bus);
- pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
- return bus;
+ pci_claim_bus_resources(host->bus);
+ pci_bus_add_devices(host->bus);
+ return host->bus;
}
void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *pbus)
--
1.7.1
.
--
Thanks!
Yijing
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
