void pci_free_host_bridge(struct pci_host_bridge *host);
#endif /* DRIVERS_PCI_H */
diff --git a/drivers/pci/probe.c b/drivers/pci/probe.c
index c8e074d..59d9be3 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/probe.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/probe.c
@@ -1889,6 +1889,8 @@ static struct pci_bus *__pci_create_root_bus(
bridge->bus = b;
b->bridge = get_device(&bridge->dev);
+ if (bridge->ops && bridge->ops->set_root_bus_speed)
+ bridge->ops->set_root_bus_speed(bridge);
Before this patch, can you do this:
- Rename the powerpc pcibios_root_bridge_prepare() to
pcibios_set_root_bus_speed() and add a call to it here
- Move the pcibios_root_bridge_prepare() call to pci_create_host_bridge()
Then this patch will make a lot more sense because it will look like this,
with the host bridge ops call right next to the matching pcibios call:
+ if (host->ops && host->ops->prepare) {
+ error = host->ops->prepare(host);
+ ...
+ }
pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(...);
+ if (bridge->ops && bridge->ops->set_root_bus_speed)
+ bridge->ops->set_root_bus_speed(bridge);
pcibios_set_root_bus_speed(...);
OK, will update.
error = pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(bridge);
if (error)
goto err_out;
@@ -1954,7 +1956,7 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, u32 db,
{
struct pci_host_bridge *host;
- host = pci_create_host_bridge(parent, db, resources, sysdata);
+ host = pci_create_host_bridge(parent, db, resources, sysdata, NULL);
if (!host)
return NULL;
@@ -2051,10 +2053,13 @@ static struct pci_bus *__pci_scan_root_bus(
pci_bus_insert_busn_res(b, b->number, 255);
}
- max = pci_scan_child_bus(b);
-
- if (!found)
- pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(b, max);
+ if (host->ops && host->ops->scan_bus) {
+ host->ops->scan_bus(host);
+ } else {
+ max = pci_scan_child_bus(b);
+ if (!found)
+ pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(b, max);
+ }
I think host->ops->scan_bus() should have the same prototype as
pci_scan_child_bus(), and it should return max, and you should do the same
busn update as when you call pci_scan_child_bus(). So the code would look
like this:
if (host->ops && host->ops->scan_bus)
max = host->ops->scan_bus(b);
else
max = pci_scan_child_bus(b);
if (!found)
pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(b, max);
OK, I will try to change the of scan_bus(), and make it return the max bus number like pci_scan_child_bus().
return b;
}
@@ -2064,7 +2069,7 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_scan_root_bus(struct device *parent, u32 db,
{
struct pci_host_bridge *host;
- host = pci_create_host_bridge(parent, db, resources, sysdata);
+ host = pci_create_host_bridge(parent, db, resources, sysdata, NULL);
if (!host)
return NULL;
diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h
index b621f5b..e9922b1 100644
--- a/include/linux/pci.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci.h
@@ -400,6 +400,13 @@ static inline int pci_channel_offline(struct pci_dev *pdev)
return (pdev->error_state != pci_channel_io_normal);
}
+struct pci_host_bridge;
+struct pci_host_bridge_ops {
+ void (*set_root_bus_speed)(struct pci_host_bridge *host);
+ int (*prepare)(struct pci_host_bridge *host);
+ void (*scan_bus)(struct pci_host_bridge *);
Needs an argument name to match the style of the other ops.
Sorry, I missed it, will add it, thanks.
+};
+
struct pci_host_bridge {
u16 domain;
u16 busnum;
@@ -407,6 +414,7 @@ struct pci_host_bridge {
struct pci_bus *bus; /* root bus */
struct list_head windows; /* resource_entry */
struct list_head list;
+ struct pci_host_bridge_ops *ops;
void (*release_fn)(struct pci_host_bridge *);
void *release_data;
};
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
.
--
Thanks!
Yijing
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html