+
+ resource_list_for_each_entry_safe(window, n, resources)
+ list_move_tail(&window->node, &host->windows);
+
+ return host;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_create_host_bridge);
Why does this need to be exported? I don't want code outside drivers/pci
using something like this.
OK, I will unexport it, if some drivers really want to export it, we could do
it when needed.
+void pci_free_host_bridge(struct pci_host_bridge *host)
struct pci_host_bridge {
u16 domain;
+ u16 busnum;
struct device dev;
struct pci_bus *bus; /* root bus */
struct list_head windows; /* resource_entry */
@@ -415,7 +416,8 @@ void pci_set_host_bridge_release(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge,
void *release_data);
int pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge);
-
+struct pci_host_bridge *pci_create_host_bridge(
+ struct device *parent, u32 dombus, struct list_head *resources);
Can these function declarations go in drivers/pci/pci.h instead? I'd
rather not expose them to the rest of the kernel unless we have to.
I would move it in drivers/pci/pci.h, thanks.
/*
* The first PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCE_NUM PCI bus resources (those that correspond
* to P2P or CardBus bridge windows) go in a table. Additional ones (for
@@ -774,6 +776,7 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_scan_bus_legacy(u32 dombus, struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysda
struct pci_bus *pci_create_root_bus(struct device *parent, u32 dombus,
struct pci_ops *ops, void *sysdata,
struct list_head *resources);
+void pci_free_host_bridge(struct pci_host_bridge *host);
int pci_bus_insert_busn_res(struct pci_bus *b, int bus, int busmax);
int pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(struct pci_bus *b, int busmax);
void pci_bus_release_busn_res(struct pci_bus *b);
--
1.7.1
.
--
Thanks!
Yijing
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
