On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 04:12:06PM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
Now we have weak functions like pcibios_root_bridge_prepare()
to setup pci host bridge, We could introduce pci_host_bridge_ops
which contain host bridge specific ops to setup pci_host_bridge.
Then host bridge driver could add pci_host_bridge_ops hooks
intead of weak function to setup pci_host_bridge.
This patch add following pci_host_bridge_ops hooks:
pci_host_bridge_ops {
/* set root bus speed, some platform need this like powerpc */
void (*phb_set_root_bus_speed)(struct pci_host_bridge *host);
/* setup pci_host_bridge before pci_host_bridge be added to driver core */
int (*phb_prepare)(struct pci_host_bridge *host);
/* platform specific of scan hook to scan pci device */
void (*phb_of_scan_bus)(struct pci_host_bridge *);
}
We could easily extend it to support different host bridge
specific operations.
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@xxxxxxxxxx>
...
@@ -2050,10 +2052,13 @@ static struct pci_bus *__pci_scan_root_bus(
pci_bus_insert_busn_res(b, b->number, 255);
}
- max = pci_scan_child_bus(b);
-
- if (!found)
- pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(b, max);
+ if (host->ops && host->ops->phb_of_scan_bus) {
+ host->ops->phb_of_scan_bus(host);
The important thing here is not the use of OF (Open Firmware/Device Tree),
is it? Why would we want "_of_" in the function name? I assume the intent
is that this host bridge op performs the same function as
pci_scan_child_bus(), so I think the op should be called "scan_bus".
+ } else {
+ max = pci_scan_child_bus(b);
+ if (!found)
+ pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(b, max);
+ }
return b;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
