Re: [PATCH v2 06/36] ncr5380: Remove more useless prototypes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/27/2014 06:26 AM, Finn Thain wrote:
Make use of the host template static initializer instead of assigning
handlers at run-time. Move __maybe_unused qualifiers from declarations
to definitions. Move the atari_scsi_bus_reset() wrapper after the
definition of NCR5380_bus_reset(). All of the host template handler
prototypes are now redundant so remove them.

The write_info() handler is only relevant to drivers using PSEUDO_DMA so
this patch fixes the compiler warning in atari_NCR5380.c and sun3_NCR5380.c:

  CC      drivers/scsi/atari_scsi.o
  drivers/scsi/NCR5380.h:329: warning: 'NCR5380_write_info' declared 'static' but never defined

Signed-off-by: Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 drivers/scsi/NCR5380.h       |    8 ----
 drivers/scsi/atari_NCR5380.c |    3 +
 drivers/scsi/atari_scsi.c    |   76 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
 drivers/scsi/dtc.c           |    7 +--
 drivers/scsi/pas16.c         |    7 +--
 drivers/scsi/sun3_NCR5380.c  |    3 +
 drivers/scsi/t128.c          |    7 +--
 7 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)

Index: linux/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.h
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.h	2014-10-27 16:25:06.000000000 +1100
+++ linux/drivers/scsi/NCR5380.h	2014-10-27 16:25:14.000000000 +1100
@@ -322,14 +322,6 @@ static irqreturn_t NCR5380_intr(int irq,
 #endif
 static void NCR5380_main(struct work_struct *work);
 static void __maybe_unused NCR5380_print_options(struct Scsi_Host *instance);
-static int NCR5380_abort(Scsi_Cmnd * cmd);
-static int NCR5380_bus_reset(Scsi_Cmnd * cmd);
-static int NCR5380_queue_command(struct Scsi_Host *, struct scsi_cmnd *);
-static int __maybe_unused NCR5380_show_info(struct seq_file *,
-	struct Scsi_Host *);
-static int __maybe_unused NCR5380_write_info(struct Scsi_Host *instance,
-	char *buffer, int length);
-
 static void NCR5380_reselect(struct Scsi_Host *instance);
 static int NCR5380_select(struct Scsi_Host *instance, Scsi_Cmnd * cmd, int tag);
 #if defined(PSEUDO_DMA) || defined(REAL_DMA) || defined(REAL_DMA_POLL)
Index: linux/drivers/scsi/dtc.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/scsi/dtc.c	2014-10-27 16:25:08.000000000 +1100
+++ linux/drivers/scsi/dtc.c	2014-10-27 16:25:14.000000000 +1100
@@ -219,10 +219,6 @@ static int __init dtc_detect(struct scsi
 	void __iomem *base;
 	int sig, count;
 
-	tpnt->proc_name = "dtc3x80";
-	tpnt->show_info = dtc_show_info;
-	tpnt->write_info = dtc_write_info;
-
 	for (count = 0; current_override < NO_OVERRIDES; ++current_override) {
 		addr = 0;
 		base = NULL;
@@ -477,6 +473,9 @@ static struct scsi_host_template driver_
 	.name				= "DTC 3180/3280 ",
 	.detect				= dtc_detect,
 	.release			= dtc_release,
+	.proc_name			= "dtc3x80",
+	.show_info			= dtc_show_info,
+	.write_info			= dtc_write_info,
 	.queuecommand			= dtc_queue_command,
 	.eh_abort_handler		= dtc_abort,
 	.eh_bus_reset_handler		= dtc_bus_reset,

What is the current consensus on using '.proc_name' ?
At one point is was claimed to be deprecated, yet the only driver
actually following this seems to be lpfc.
(_And_ we have a patch in our tree to hook that back in).

Can't we just get it back for the time being and decide upon a
proper solution later?

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		      zSeries & Storage
hare@xxxxxxx			      +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux