Hi Geert,
On 21/08/14 17:30, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Greg,
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:04 AM, <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I propose that we move the arch/m68k/platform/coldfire directory to be
directly under arch/m68k.
The current platform/ structure was inhereted from the move of m68knommu,
and is inconsistent with the existing m68k platforms (each having a
directory under arch/m68k).
Moving platform/coldfire is quite strait forward. The following patches do a
move, and fix up the broken pathname comments.
That sounds fine to me.
This does leave the question of what to do with the other directories still
under arch/m68k/platform, namely 68000 and 68360. Should they be moved in
the same way as coldfire?
I think the 68*328 and 68360 SoC support can have their own directories,
as these are platforms.
However, these directories also contain 68000 and 68360 CPU support,
which we may want to share with other platforms in the future, to support
68000-based Amigas, Ataris, Macs, Suns, ...
But as that's a problem to fix when someone is working on it, it's fine
for me to move these one level up, too.
Thanks for the feedback. I'll prepare patches that move these too then.
Regards
Greg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
