On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 07/23/2014 05:51 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
Revert since we're trying to return -ENXIO from a function returning
unsigned int. Not only it causes compiler warnings it's also obviously
incorrect.
In general, watch for patches from Nick Krause since they are not even
build tested.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Guess I wasn't fast enough with my comments :-(
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/m68k/q40/q40ints.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/m68k/q40/q40ints.c b/arch/m68k/q40/q40ints.c
index 9dfa1ea..513f9bb 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/q40/q40ints.c
+++ b/arch/m68k/q40/q40ints.c
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static unsigned int q40_irq_startup(struct irq_data
*data)
case 1: case 2: case 8: case 9:
case 11: case 12: case 13:
printk("%s: ISA IRQ %d not implemented by HW\n", __func__,
irq);
- return -ENXIO;
+ /* FIXME return -ENXIO; */
}
return 0;
}
I guess this is another bad patch :(.
Nick
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
