Re: futex_init() vs. KERNEL_DS, was Re: Boot crash on 68030

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 02:12:22PM +1100, Finn Thain wrote:
Data read fault at 0x00000000 in Super Data (pc=0x3afec) BAD KERNEL 
BUSERR

I think futex_init needs to do set_fs(USER_DS), since futex is about 
user data.

Rhetorical question: does it make sense to explicitly switch to USER_DS 
when we know that current->mm may be invalid at the time?

Given that the presence of USER_DS or KERNEL_DS at initcall-time varies 
between architectures, perhaps this question must be left to arch 
implementors.

All architectures start with KERNEL_DS, otherwise the first couple of system
calls within kernel_init() would all fail and the system wouldn't boot.

Moreover, architectures that have no need for a run-time test for usable 
futex_value ops have no real interest in such questions. AFAICT, only mips 
needs the run-time test.

For every other arch the availability of futex_value ops is known at 
compile-time. We don't need to pursue universal answers to questions like 
these:

1) the correctness of switching to USER_DS with mm->current == NULL [1]

I "fixed" s390, so it should survive an early switch to USER_DS and a
subsequent failing user space access now.

Anyway,

The discussion of these questions in various threads on various lists did 
not resolve anything. Again, this is probably because all of these 
questions are actually arch implementation issues.

So it seems to me that the solution to the futex_init() problem is to 
evaluate the futex_cmpxchg_enabled assignment at compile-time where 
possible, and use the run-time test only on mips. Thoughts?

Such a patch exists already (bottom of message):

http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=138875880028607&w=2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux