Re: don't use module_init in non-modular ... (was: Re: [PATCH] m68k: don't use module_init in non-modular mvme16x/rtc.c code)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Jan 19, 2014, at 7:27 PM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:

[Re: don't use module_init in non-modular ... (was: Re: [PATCH] m68k: don't use module_init in non-modular mvme16x/rtc.c code)] On 19/01/2014 (Sun 10:40) Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

The word "module" has different meanings: it can be a "loadable kernel module", or just a "code module". include/linux/init.h seems to agree with this:

I think for most people, "module" means an actual "foo.ko" that can be
fed to insmod.  And it is generated by code that is controlled by a
tristate config.  Otherwise, sure "init/main.c" is a "code module" and
so is every C file, making the distinction meaningless.  Further....

Consider calling the C file a "unit", analogous (and isomorphic) to "translation unit".

Josh


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux