Hi Simon,
On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 03:08:50PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've taken a quick look over this and it seems reasonable to me.
Thanks!
However, I wonder if I should wait for review of the kernel-side
to be completed before applying the kexec-tools patches.
Let me know what you think.
The kexec-tools part seems to be stable. The issues to be sorted out are on
the kernel side.
As the kexec-tools portion of this change isn't useful without the
kernel portion I think I would like to wait before applying this series.
Please repost once the kernel changes have been merged or if you
would like them re-considered for any other reason.
The kernel part is working now.
I didn't make any changes to kexec-tools for v3.
Do you want me to resend them anyway, or can you just take v2?
Thanks again!
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
