Am 26.09.2013 18:06, schrieb Ramkumar Ramachandra:
Richard Weinberger wrote:
And, of course, this makes your patch valid.
Can you also please ensure that your new defconfigs are minimal?
Yeah, it's close to a minimal configuration for the 3.10 kernel
(latest at the time of patch submission). I was aiming to minimize the
diff between the current defconfig and the two new defconfigs in
configs/. The slim diffstat does the talking:
arch/um/Kconfig.common | 5 -
arch/um/Makefile | 11 ++
arch/um/{defconfig => configs/i386_defconfig} | 209 +++++++++++++-------
arch/um/{defconfig => configs/x86_64_defconfig} | 250 +++++++++++++++---------
arch/x86/um/Kconfig | 5 +
5 files changed, 306 insertions(+), 174 deletions(-)
copy arch/um/{defconfig => configs/i386_defconfig} (86%)
rename arch/um/{defconfig => configs/x86_64_defconfig} (83%)
If we find some deficiencies, we can always update it. For now, please
commit these two patches.
Please resend them with savedefconfig applied.
There is no need to have three commits for that.
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
