Re: linux 3.10.1 with initrd (was Re: linux 3.8.12-1 (atari flavour) does not boot)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Michael Schmitz
<schmitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[    0.160000] WARNING: at /root/linux-3.10.1/init/main.c:698
do_one_initcall+0x12e/0x13a()
[    0.160000] initcall param_sysfs_init+0x0/0x1a4 returned with disabled
interrupts

This seems to happen for several initcalls. Geert et al,
can you have a look at them, they’re scary ☺


It only happens on multi-platform kernels, because of the following
definition
of ALLOWINT:

#if defined(MACH_ATARI_ONLY)
        /* block out HSYNC = ipl 2 on the atari */
#define ALLOWINT        (~0x500)
#else
        /* portable version */
#define ALLOWINT        (~0x700)
#endif /* machine compilation types */

On an Atari-only kernel, flags is either 0x00c02204 or 0x00c02214.
Hence "flags & ~ALLOWINT" is "flags & 0x500" is always zero.

On a multi-platform kernel, flags is one of 0x00c02004, 0x00c02014,
0x00c02204, or 0x00c02214.
Hence "flags & ~ALLOWINT" is "flags & 0x700" is sometimes non-zero,
triggering the warning.

Anyone who sees a solution that doesn't involve adding a variable to hold
ALLOWINT?

We're already having a check for Q40 in arch_local_irq_enable()
(in multi-platfom kernels only).


Didn't we have that sorted out earlier? I seem to recall this has surfaced
before.

You mean commit 94674cd5299e825cb31979c3b9a4c1a3e6074839
("m68k: Correct the Atari ALLOWINT definition")? That was a related but
slightly different problem.

What is the cause of the problem exactly - the hsync handler changing the
IPL to block out further interrupts, whenever it is called for the first
time after interrupts are enabled? We could stop doing that on
multi-platform kernels (taking all hsync interrupts will be a performance
hit but not stop the system from working).

AFAICS, it's indeed the hsync handler blocking further interrupts on
multi-platform kernels.

On multi-platform kernels, enabling interrupts enables all 7 levels
(interrupt enable/disable is either all-or-nothing in Linux, there are
no priorities).
When the hblank interrupt comes in, its handler (falcon_hblhandler())
disables level 2 interrupts again, to prevent more interrupts coming in,
which would slow down the system.
However, this causes arch_irqs_disabled_flags() to think interrupts are
completely disabled, causing the warnings in the logs.

We could ignore IPL2 when running on Atari (untested whitespace-damaged
patch):

--- a/arch/m68k/include/asm/irqflags.h
+++ b/arch/m68k/include/asm/irqflags.h
@@ -67,7 +67,11 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_restore(unsigned long flags

 static inline bool arch_irqs_disabled_flags(unsigned long flags)
 {
-       return (flags & ~ALLOWINT) != 0;
+       if (MACH_IS_ATARI) {
+               /* Ignore HSYNC = ipl 2 on Atari */
+               return (flags & ~(ALLOWINT | 0x200)) != 0;
+       } else
+           return (flags & ~ALLOWINT) != 0;
 }

 static inline bool arch_irqs_disabled(void)

or just ignore all priorities on all platforms, and consider interrupts disabled
iff all priorities are disabled:

--- a/arch/m68k/include/asm/irqflags.h
+++ b/arch/m68k/include/asm/irqflags.h
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_restore(unsigned long flags

 static inline bool arch_irqs_disabled_flags(unsigned long flags)
 {
-       return (flags & ~ALLOWINT) != 0;
+       return (flags & ~ALLOWINT) != ~ALLOWINT;
 }

 static inline bool arch_irqs_disabled(void)

The former is safer but slower, the second is faster but will miss cases
where some interrupt priorities are disabled.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux