Re: [PATCH] clk: Make the managed clk functions generically available

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 09:40:14PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 01:25:55PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:35:36AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:00:37AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 10:31:52PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:43:07PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
I wouldn't mind having this merged sooner rather than later, there is at least
one driver in next which is currently broken due to the missing devm_clk_get.
Russell what's your plan for the patch? Maybe under the given circumstances it
makes sense to let it go through the m68k tree.

Ok, I've merged it but there was no indication in the patch that it was
supposed to be a fix... there's no cc: to stable.  Does it need to go to
stable?  When was this brokenness introduced?  What's the story for the
m68k bit?

I said abouve "I've merged it" - that means, I've put it in my
tree...

What tree is this supposed to go through? I've checked your ARM tree as
well as Mike's clock tree but neither seem to carry this patch. The
reason I ask is because I want to take a patch series that converts the
Unicore32 PWM code to the PWM framework into linux-next but it depends
on this patch as well.

It /is/ in my tree (you'll notice that it is in linux-next.)  You're
probably looking at my Linaro tree instead, which doesn't carry
anything which isn't about to be sent to Linus.

I must be blind then. next-20120918 doesn't have it. And looking at your
tree here[0] doesn't show the commit either.

Hmm, it's possible I didn't push the tree out... well, I have done so
now, so it should be visible from tonight onwards and should be in
-next sometime during the next couple of days (it seems to take a
couple of days between me pushing stuff out one evening to stuff
appearing in -next because of the timezones and timing of sfr's pulls.)

Okay, I see it both in your tree and in linux-next now. Thanks!

Thierry

Attachment: pgpqtmYeRF6gX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux