On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 05:21:23PM +0200, Stany MARCEL wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Stany MARCEL
<stany.marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Signed-off-by: Stany MARCEL <stany.marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
This driver is an adaption of the one given by freescale for kernel 2.6.25.
Tested with kernel 3.4.8 with arch/m68k backported from linux-m68k head
2 FEC configured with shared phy
drivers/net/phy/Kconfig | 7 +-
drivers/net/phy/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/net/phy/broadcom522x.c | 171 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
This patch and "[PATCH 3/3] Add support to M54xx DMA FEC Driver" need to go
through the netdev tree, or collect acks there.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
Hello Geert,
Please, what is the good process to follow as patch 3 depends on patch 1 ?
Actually, IMHO patch 3 does not depend on patch 1, and I even think that
patch 1 is not needed, except to get a message with "BCM5222" instead
of "Generic PHY" in the kernel log.
AFAIK the phy interface is standardized.
Philippe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
