On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Philippe De Muyter <phdm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:25:44PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
On 08/06/12 23:35, Philippe De Muyter wrote:
...
I mentionned that only to make you able to soften the commit comment :)
Ok, makes sense. I should probably have mentioned that this means
the ColdFire processors currently support by Linux :-)
Something like:
All of the current Linux supported ColdFire CPUs handle unaligned
memory accesses. So remove the CONFIG_CPU_HAS_NO_UNALIGNED option
selection for ColdFire. If we ever support a specific ColdFire CPU
that does not support unaligned accesses then we can insert the
CONFIG_CPU_HAS_NO_UNALIGNED for that specific CPU type.
That's perfect. The line about dumb copying of the m68knommu settings
was too much self-flagellation for you to my eyes :)
So I rewrote history on my for-3.6 branch...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
