On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 5:06 PM, richard -rw- weinberger
<richard.weinberger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:18 AM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ok, both of the patches look sane to me, but it would really be nice
to hear from somebody with the actual affected architectures, and get
a tested-by.
UML is affected:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/1/8/186
I wasted an hour finding out why it is crashing.
Instead of testing kernels I really should read more LKML. ;-)
Hmm.
Ben - how about that
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct cpu, cpu_devices);
approach that Richard uses in his patch, instead of the kcalloc? And
clearly UM should also do that CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES thing with
your patch.
Richard - does Ben's patch work for you too if you just add "select
GENERIC_CPU_DEVICES" in the UM Kconfig too (Kconfig.common, probably)?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
