On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 11:58 +0900, sfjro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Thorsten Glaser:It introduces a new separated file include/linux/aufs_name.h.Isn=E2=80=99t that a bit overkill?Hmm, I may have to agree with that. Honestly speaking, I don't like this approach. But embedding (expanding) AUFS_NAME is worse for me.
Why, how often do you expect to change AUFS_NAME? [...]
So I still think it is better to define it in Makefile. If I remove refering the "current" macro in the definition, then the life will be easier, but it is still useful and I want to keep it. Additonally it is not a essential problem I think. Finally I'd like to add sched.h between aufs_name and pr_fmt (see the attached patch). How do you think?
I think it would be much better to put this in fs/aufs/aufs.h and make each of fs/aufs/*.c include that first.
J. R. Okajima --- a/fs/aufs/Makefile +++ b/fs/aufs/Makefile @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ endif ccflags-y += -DDEBUG # sparse doesn't allow spaces ccflags-y += -imacros linux/aufs_name.h +ccflags-y += -include linux/sched.h ccflags-y += -D'pr_fmt(fmt)=AUFS_NAME"\040%s:%d:%s[%d]:\040"fmt,__func__,__LINE__,current->comm,current->pid' obj-$(CONFIG_AUFS_FS) += aufs.o
The comment about sparse belongs immediately before the definition of pr_fmt. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings All the simple programs have been written, and all the good names taken.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
