On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 10:34, Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 10:26 +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Mon, 7 Nov 2011, Paul Bolle wrote:
1) If SERIAL_8250_HP300 is set but neither HPDCA nor HPAPCI are set we
end up with an elaborate nop, don't we? Initialization should always
fail in that case. So effectively SERIAL_8250_HP300 depends on HPDCA
and/or HPAPCI. Was there perhaps some problem in translating that
dependency into a Kconfig dependency?
[...]
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250_hp300.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250_hp300.c
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
#include "8250.h"
#if !defined(CONFIG_HPDCA) && !defined(CONFIG_HPAPCI)
-#warning CONFIG_8250 defined but neither CONFIG_HPDCA nor CONFIG_HPAPCI defined, are you sure?
+#warning CONFIG_SERIAL_8250 defined but neither CONFIG_HPDCA nor CONFIG_HPAPCI defined, are you sure?
#endif
What is the point of this warning anyway? Shouldn't everything necessary
be taken care of by Kconfig rules?
That's exactly what I'm trying to find out with my questions (aimed at
the m68k people, see 1) above).
I already had that on my todo list...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
