Re: [PATCH] m68k: Merge mmu and non-mmu versions of sys_call_table

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 11:53, Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

From 5739b340b334de21c6da4f65d5194957662a6dd0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 May 2011 20:33:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] m68k: unistd - Comment out definitions for unimplemented syscalls

This is not a good idea at least for the syscalls referenced by glibc.
It means that a glibc compiled against this <asm/unistd.h> will lose the
ability to call those syscalls even if the running kernel happens to
implement them.

But is any of them likely to be ever implemented on m68k?
Perhaps AFS, vserver and {get,put}pmsg()?
All others seem to be old, obsolete, or i386-only.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux