On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think it's better to just remove all #ifdefed out parts in the code.
I'm good either way, as long as the broken "old code" is no longer present.
The patch is reversed?
My apologies, you're correct. In case anyone is interested in the
correct patch:
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Elchison <jelchison@xxxxxxxxx>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
diff -up linux-2.6_orig/arch/m68k/math-emu/multi_arith.h
linux-2.6/arch/m68k/math-emu/multi_arith.h
--- linux-2.6_orig/arch/m68k/math-emu/multi_arith.h 2011-06-10
22:47:43.407285452 -0400
+++ linux-2.6/arch/m68k/math-emu/multi_arith.h 2011-06-10
22:50:32.538711320 -0400
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static inline void lsl64(int count, unsi
{
if (count < 32) {
HI_WORD(*dest) = (HI_WORD(*dest) << count)
- | (LO_WORD(*dest) >> count);
+ | (LO_WORD(*dest) >> (32 - count));
LO_WORD(*dest) <<= count;
return;
}
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Please personally CC me on responses to this post.
v/r,
--
Jonathan Elchison
jelchison@xxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
