On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 05:47, Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
i.e. ignoring the node_present_pages return value does result in a booting kernel even with the problematic commit included.
Iâm trying now (using a cross compiler, to speed up testing). Sorry for not doing anything for a while, the âair has left meâ (generally and due to lack of progress with m68k as one can only be the only fighter for ever so long). But I was just told by a member of the Debian Kernel Team on IRC that the patches from m68k-v2.6.38 will (probably) not be accepted, unless they go in via Linusâ tree. How are chances of that happening? (He says they had told that years ago al- ready.) Iâll need at least the ARAnyM/NatFeat support and some of the bugfixes. Otherwise I fear this keeps getting obsolete very fast. â bye, //mirabilos -- <ch> you introduced a merge commit â<mika> % g rebase -i HEAD^^ <mika> sorry, no idea and rebasing just fscked â<mika> Segmentation <ch> should have cloned into a clean repo â fault (core dumped) <ch> if I rebase that now, it's really ugh â<mika:#grml> wuahhhhhh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
