Re: Writable sys_call_table (was: Re: [uClinux-dev] [PATCH] m68k: Merge mmu and non-mmu versions of sys_call_table)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Tue, 19 Apr 2011, Andreas Schwab wrote:

Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Wouldn't that require const void * const sys_call_table[] ?

No, the right signature would be void (*const sys_call_table[])(void)
since this is an array of function pointers.

Right. I mis-parsed the definition as a pointer to an array... Sorry about 
the noise.

Finn



Andreas.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux