Re: [regression v2.6.38] Re: [PATCH v2] brk: fix min_brk lower bound computation for COMPAT_BRK

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 24 Mar 2011, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH] brk: fix min_brk lower bound computation for COMPAT_BRK

Even if CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK is set in the kernel configuration, it can still
be overriden by randomize_va_space sysctl.

If this is the case, the min_brk computation in sys_brk() implementation
is wrong, as it solely takes into account COMPAT_BRK setting, assuming
that brk start is not randomized. But that might not be the case if
randomize_va_space sysctl has been set to '2' at the time the binary has
been loaded from disk.

In such case, the check has to be done in a same way as in
!CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK case.

In addition to that, the check for the COMPAT_BRK case introduced back in
a5b4592c ("brk: make sys_brk() honor COMPAT_BRK when computing lower
bound") is slightly wrong -- the lower bound shouldn't be mm->end_code,
but mm->end_data instead, as that's where the legacy applications expect
brk section to start (i.e. immediately after last global variable).

Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>
---
Âmm/mmap.c | Â 10 +++++++++-
Â1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
index 50a4aa0..ca2f164 100644
--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@ -253,7 +253,15 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(brk, unsigned long, brk)
   Âdown_write(&mm->mmap_sem);

Â#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK
- Â Â Â min_brk = mm->end_code;
+ Â Â Â /*
+ Â Â Â Â* CONFIG_COMPAT_BRK can still be overridden by setting
+ Â Â Â Â* randomize_va_space to 2, which will still make mm->start_brk
+ Â Â Â Â* to be arbitrarily shifted
+ Â Â Â Â*/
+ Â Â Â if (mm->start_brk > PAGE_ALIGN(mm->end_data))
+ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â min_brk = mm->start_brk;
+ Â Â Â else
+ Â Â Â Â Â Â Â min_brk = mm->end_data;
Â#else
   Âmin_brk = mm->start_brk;
Â#endif
--
1.7.3.1

Sorry for chiming in this late, but I've just bisected a problem in
2.6.38 to commit
5520e89485252c759ee60d313e9422447659947b ("brk: fix min_brk lower bound
computation for COMPAT_BRK").

When booting my very old test ramdisk on Amiga/m68k, it fails like this:

| RAMDISK: gzip image found at block 0
| VFS: Mounted root (ext2 filesystem) readonly on device 1:0.
| warning: process `update' used the obsolete bdflush system call
| Fix your initscripts?
| init: cannot open inittab
| Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!

Sorry for not noticing earlier, I usually boot full Debians under ARAnyM,
instead of booting old ramdisks with libc5-based binaries that once were
considered new.

Oh well, one has to love the libc5-based binaries indeed.

Is the patch below fixing the issue you are seeing on your Amiga/m68k? 
Thanks.


diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
index 2ec8eb5..0a02531 100644
--- a/mm/mmap.c
+++ b/mm/mmap.c
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(brk, unsigned long, brk)
 	if (mm->start_brk > PAGE_ALIGN(mm->end_data))
 		min_brk = mm->start_brk;
 	else
-		min_brk = mm->end_data;
+		min_brk = mm->end_code;
 #else
 	min_brk = mm->start_brk;
 #endif




-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux