Re: [PATCH 1/3] module: deal with alignment issues in built-in module versions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 15:08 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Gaah, I didn't realize that we've never had to do anything like this
before, and that the exception table is all arch-specific code. So we
don't have any way to "output that damned pointer and stop whining
about it" model at all.

Actually, I don't think the problem is about ".word" vs ".xword". We
should be able to just use ".long" everywhere.

But the symbol _name_ may have different prefixes, and when we use
"asm()" at the top level, we can't use the expressions to fix it up.
So a

  asm(".long %0":'i" (symbol))

doesn't work (ignore the lack of section naming, that's not
important), and neither can we just do something like

  #define output_asm_pointer(section, symbol) \
       asm(".long " #symbol)

portably, because some linker formats want to see prepended underscores etc.

Except that .long is 32-bit on ppc64 :-( You need .llong for 64-bit.

Cheers,
Ben.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux