Re: Early crash (was: Re: module: show version information for built-in modules in sysfs)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 02:52:04PM -0800, Andreas Schwab wrote:
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

But why is it aligned on 2-byte boundary and why m64k is not happy with
module_version_attribute but is happy with kernel_param which is also
aligned similarly?

struct kernel_parm doesn't contain internal padding on 32 bit
architectures (it does on 64bit architectures though).

If we unroll module_version_attribute it woud look like this:

struct module_version_attribute {

	struct module_attribute {

		struct attribute {
			const char *name;
			mode_t mode;
		} attr;
		...

	} mattr;

	const char *module_name;
	const char *version;
};

So I would expect it be aligned on (char *) boundary which should be the
same as (void *).

mode_t is a 16 bit type, thus any following member becomes aligned on an
odd 2 byte boundary.

Even pointers? I'd expect pointers to be aligned on 4-bytes boundaries?

Thanks,

Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux