On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 20:24, Michael Schmitz
<schmitzmic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:44 AM, Thorsten Glaser <tg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
currently At wOrk, but here is something from the log:
ÂCALL Â Â/tmp/buildd/linux-2.6-2.6.37/debian/build/source_m68k_none/scripts/checksyscalls.sh
<stdin>:1522:2: warning: #warning syscall recvmmsg not implemented
I'm sure I have seen this one before.
It's a false positive, as we implement it through the socketcall demultiplexer.
Some archs implement them all using individual syscalls.
BTW, PPC recently started doing both, and is trying to phase out the
socketcall way.
ÂCC Â Â Âsecurity/keys/keyctl.o
/tmp/buildd/linux-2.6-2.6.37/debian/build/source_m68k_none/security/keys/keyctl.c:1346:2: warning: #warning TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME not implemented
Waiting for someone with spare time to implement it...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
            Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
             Â Â -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
