On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 12:22, Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It builds for me if I disable CONFIG_SPEAKUP. Otherwise, I get:
drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_dtlk.c: In function 'synth_probe':
drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_dtlk.c:339: error: implicit declaration of function 'inw_p'
make[3]: *** [drivers/staging/speakup/speakup_dtlk.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [drivers/staging/speakup] Error 2
make[1]: *** [drivers/staging] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2
OTOH, I am using my own build of gcc 4.4.4-8 and none of this was built
with apt, so YMMV...
I suppose another alternative would be to omit or reverse the patch that
adds speakup in the first place, if that's more convenient.
I don't think it makes sense to build staging drivers on Debian/m68k.
So can't you default to CONFIG_STAGING=n?
While I do enable them in my test builds to catch portability issues, most of
them don't matter for m68k at all.
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Finn Thain dixit:
It would be better if we used the same .config, don't you think?
*sigh*
# apt-get source linux-2.6
# cd linux-2.6-2.6.32
optionally:
# $EDITOR debian/config/m68k/defines
â in [base] comment out everything except âflavours:â and âatariâ
 to save time compiling the other images
then:
# debian/rules clean
(this may give you an error message)
# dpkg-buildpackage -B
So, no modifications to stock Debian. Well, except for #598893â
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
            Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
             Â Â -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
