Re: [PATCH 1/1] m68k: add missing I/O macros {in,out}{w,l}_p() for !CONFIG_ISA

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, Thorsten Glaser wrote:

Besides, itâs easier to get a bunch of modules that donât do anything 
except say the hardware they steer isnât available to compile than to 
change the config

Which modules are we talking about? In 2.6.32-23, debian patches speakup 
into drivers/staging but I don't see it in mainline drivers/accessibility 
or drivers/staging.

If the bug is not in the mainline, then the fix should arguably be 
downstream too. (Policy seems to be that the mainline doesn't carry code 
that doesn't have in-tree users.)

(especially as the latter potentially has to be done for every new 
kernel version, and Iâd rather keep things working, as they seem to 
change very quickly and nobody can keep up really).

Is it easier to maintain local patches from one debian release to another 
than it is to maintain .config changes?

Finn


bye,
//mirabilos

[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux