On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 10:37 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 21:42, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 08:25, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Instead of abusing the ScsiHost base field I'd prefer if you stick
I wouldn't call it abuse: it's a (MM)IO base address anyway.
But I see that field was indeed marked `legacy crap' in an otherwise
innocent looking
commit to split the SCSI include files... by you ;-)
a properly typed pointer into the device specific host data.
You mean shost_priv()? That field already contains a pointer to the
struct WD33C93_hostdata.
But I'll create a new a2091_hostdata struct that contains both the
WD33C93_hostdata and the a2091_scsiregs pointer (and do the same
for gvp11.c and a3000.c). It's a bit similar to what sgiwd93.c does, albeit that
one also uses the legacy base field.
As I want to avoid introducing bugs by respinning the complicated
parts (the zorro
driver and platform driver conversion patches), I made this change on
top of the 2
whole patch series.
A2091 part:
I've applied up to 10/21 which should make it easier, but this patch
refuses to apply:
patch: **** malformed patch at line 230: struct scsi_cmnd *SCpnt,
could you respin the remaining patches so they'll actually apply?
Thanks,
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
