On Thu, 15 Apr 2010, David Miller wrote:
- printk("Don't know how to access card memory!\n");
+ pr_info("Don't know how to access card memory!\n");
No, this is pr_err. The driver sets dev->mem_start expecting it to work,
obviously.
It was an unspecified printk() so Joe's conversion is equal
and that's a good way for him to have made these changes.
Seems to me that the code went from unspecified to wrong. But I can see
your point of view.
If we want to mark this as KERN_ERR or whatever, that's entirely a
seperate change.
I think your objections to Joe's changes are completely uncalled for and
his changes were good ones.
Here's a patch, both uncalled-for and untested.
Signed-off-by: Finn Thain <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--- a/drivers/net/mac8390.c 2010-04-16 13:31:04.000000000 +1000
+++ b/drivers/net/mac8390.c 2010-04-16 13:35:06.000000000 +1000
@@ -554,7 +554,7 @@
case MAC8390_APPLE:
switch (mac8390_testio(dev->mem_start)) {
case ACCESS_UNKNOWN:
- pr_info("Don't know how to access card memory!\n");
+ pr_err("Don't know how to access card memory!\n");
return -ENODEV;
break;
@@ -643,8 +643,8 @@
{
__ei_open(dev);
if (request_irq(dev->irq, __ei_interrupt, 0, "8390 Ethernet", dev)) {
- pr_info("%s: unable to get IRQ %d.\n", dev->name, dev->irq);
- return -EAGAIN;
+ pr_err("%s: unable to get IRQ %d.\n", dev->name, dev->irq);
+ return -EBUSY;
}
return 0;
}
@@ -660,7 +660,7 @@
{
ei_status.txing = 0;
if (ei_debug > 1)
- pr_info("reset not supported\n");
+ pr_debug("reset not supported\n");
return;
}
@@ -668,7 +668,7 @@
{
unsigned char *target = nubus_slot_addr(IRQ2SLOT(dev->irq));
if (ei_debug > 1)
- pr_info("Need to reset the NS8390 t=%lu...", jiffies);
+ pr_debug("Need to reset the NS8390 t=%lu...", jiffies);
ei_status.txing = 0;
target[0xC0000] = 0;
if (ei_debug > 1)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
