Re: atomic_sub_and_test() asm constraints

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

|   CC      mm/memcontrol.o
| {standard input}: Assembler messages:
| {standard input}:4076: Error: operands mismatch -- statement `subl
12(%fp),170(%a0)' ignored

Seems like we have bad asm constraints in

static inline int atomic_sub_and_test(int i, atomic_t *v)
{
        char c;
        __asm__ __volatile__("subl %2,%1; seq %0" : "=d" (c), "+m"
(*v): "g" (i));

Surely "g" is wrong, sub only accepts a data register as source operand
when the destination is in memory.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux