Re: Fwd: [PATCH] [RFC] ataflop: remove buggy IRQ disable from do_fd_request()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




[ restoring original recepient list, and thus keeping all your text 
  below for reference ]

On Sun, 11 Oct 2009, Michael Schmitz wrote:

There is a nice gem in drivers/block/ataflop.c::do_fd_request()

	void do_fd_request(struct request_queue * q)
	{
		unsigned long flags;

		DPRINT(("do_fd_request for pid %d\n",current->pid));
		while( fdc_busy ) sleep_on( &fdc_wait );
		fdc_busy = 1;
		stdma_lock(floppy_irq, NULL);

		atari_disable_irq( IRQ_MFP_FDC );
		local_save_flags(flags);        /* The request function is called with ints
		local_irq_disable();             * disabled... so must save the IPL
for later */
		redo_fd_request();
		local_irq_restore(flags);
		atari_enable_irq( IRQ_MFP_FDC );
	}

If you look at the code long enough, you will notioce that the
local_irq_disable() call is actually commented out. This has been
introduced back in 2002 in [1], but as you can see, the same bug has been
there even before, with the sti() call being commented out in the very
same way :)

I am not familiar with the code myself at all, but I guess that the whole
stuff can just be removed. Why do we need save_flags/restore_flags at all,
without actually disabling the local IRQs afterwards? The

The IRQ source has been disabled in the MFC by the atari_disable_irq( 
IRQ_MFP_FDC ) call just before local_save_flags(flags). For that reason, 
the fact that local_irq_disable is commented out will not usually matter 
(a timer interrupt that would result in retrying the floppy request or 
removing the request from the queue excepted).

I would rather suggest to leave the code in, and fix the buggy comments instead.

Note: IDE or SCSI cannot get in the way here -and I haven't seen IDE and 
floppy races in recent kernels. SCSI was pretty broken anyway last time I tried 
a few months ago. I cannot run any tests since my PC motherboard or CPU died 
recently.

redo_fd_request() doesn't seem to do anything that would mess with flags
inconsistently.

But I'd rather anyone who has touched the surrounding code in past years
Ack it. I can then take it through trivial tree or submit to akpm.

The surounding code probably hasn't been touched in ages. The floppy driver in 
its current state does work. If redo_fd_request could alter timers ot queues, 
rmoving the locking would be dangerous, no?

The patch is not removing any locking. It only

1) removes the local_irq_disable() that has been commented out for many 
   years already anyway
2) removes the saving and restoring of CPU flags around do_fd_request(), 
   which is rather clearly a nop than any kind of "locking"

[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2002/12/27/58

Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@xxxxxxx>

NAck for my part. 

Please elaborate a little bit more which of the two points above you base 
your NACK on.


	Michael


---
 drivers/block/ataflop.c |    3 ---
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/ataflop.c b/drivers/block/ataflop.c
index 847a9e5..a5af1d6 100644
--- a/drivers/block/ataflop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/ataflop.c
@@ -1478,10 +1478,7 @@ void do_fd_request(struct request_queue * q)
 	stdma_lock(floppy_irq, NULL);

 	atari_disable_irq( IRQ_MFP_FDC );
-	local_save_flags(flags);	/* The request function is called with ints
-	local_irq_disable();		 * disabled... so must save the IPL for later */
 	redo_fd_request();
-	local_irq_restore(flags);
 	atari_enable_irq( IRQ_MFP_FDC );
 }


-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux