Re: toolchain, was Re: bogl: don't know screen type 1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ok, i've nearly finished my manual install of 3.1r8...
I've got two problems, im missing
/lib/modules/2.4.27-amiga/modules.dep ( does anyone have it handy? )

And a "passwd: Authentication token manipulation error"
I've checked the perms of /etc/shadow they are shadow root and correct
rw. so is passwd

And i can so far only boot into single user mode. But that will work for now.

-Mike

2009/9/22 mike <localgost@xxxxxxxxx>:
Seems im not the only soul feeling the bloat
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13505_3-10358024-16.html

I havent seen any 68k linux benchmarks for this yet
http://cshandley.co.uk/temp/membench/
http://amigaworld.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=29569&forum=14

It would be interesting if someone could compare a binary compiled
with gcc 2.95 to 3.33 3.40 and or 4.4 for linux, on various systems
even. To see if the slowdown has any consistency.

-Mike


2009/9/14  <fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:

fthain@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Sat, 5 Sep 2009, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:

Finn Thain wrote: ...

I understand that the current GCC (4.4) lacks the necessary
patches, and 4.5 is still uncooked (and that's a scary prospect).
Can someone confirm that this is the necessary patch for 4.4:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-05/msg01024.html
I think GCC 4.4 should be good enough.

I tried patching 4.4.1 and the patch was rejected. It expects
m68k_legitimize_address() to have been declared and defined, but that
routine isn't in gcc-4.4.

m68k.c:m68k_legitimize_address() was macro m68k.h:LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS(),
you need to move the hunk to m68k.h.


Thanks for the tip.

Here's a second cut. This one removes the m68k_tls_symbol_p() routine and
inlines that logic in the LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS macro (avoids a reference to
m68k_tls_symbol_p() from explow.o). The TARGET_HAVE_TLS macro wasn't
defined in explow.c so I changed it to HAVE_AS_TLS.

It appears to work, but I won't be able to test any binary produced by
this compiler for a week or so.

Finn


--- gcc-m68k-support-for-tls.patch      2009-09-14 15:11:39.893286532 +1000
+++ gcc-m68k-support-for-tls-backport.patch     2009-09-14 15:11:34.563287784 +1000
@@ -574,13 +574,7 @@

 enum reg_class regno_reg_class[] =
 {
-@@ -143,11 +144,13 @@ static tree m68k_handle_fndecl_attribute
- static void m68k_compute_frame_layout (void);
- static bool m68k_save_reg (unsigned int regno, bool interrupt_handler);
- static bool m68k_ok_for_sibcall_p (tree, tree);
-+static bool m68k_tls_symbol_p (rtx);
- static rtx m68k_legitimize_address (rtx, rtx, enum machine_mode);
- static bool m68k_rtx_costs (rtx, int, int, int *, bool);
+@@ -146,6 +147,7 @@ static tree m68k_handle_fndecl_attribute
 #if M68K_HONOR_TARGET_STRICT_ALIGNMENT
 static bool m68k_return_in_memory (const_tree, const_tree);
 #endif
@@ -613,16 +607,6 @@
       && crtl->uses_pic_offset_table)
     insn = emit_insn (gen_load_got (pic_offset_table_rtx));
 }
-@@ -1431,6 +1441,9 @@ m68k_legitimize_sibcall_address (rtx x)
- rtx
- m68k_legitimize_address (rtx x, rtx oldx, enum machine_mode mode)
- {
-+  if (m68k_tls_symbol_p (x))
-+    return m68k_legitimize_tls_address (x);
-+
-   if (GET_CODE (x) == PLUS)
-     {
-       int ch = (x) != (oldx);
 @@ -1849,7 +1862,7 @@ m68k_illegitimate_symbolic_constant_p (r
         && !offset_within_block_p (base, INTVAL (offset)))
       return true;
@@ -957,7 +941,7 @@
       return orig;

       gcc_assert (reg);
-@@ -2196,13 +2421,257 @@ legitimize_pic_address (rtx orig, enum m
+@@ -2196,13 +2421,244 @@ legitimize_pic_address (rtx orig, enum m
                                    base == reg ? 0 : reg);

       if (GET_CODE (orig) == CONST_INT)
@@ -1164,19 +1148,6 @@
 +  return orig;
 +}
 +
-+/* Return true if X is a TLS symbol.  */
-+
-+static bool
-+m68k_tls_symbol_p (rtx x)
-+{
-+  if (!TARGET_HAVE_TLS)
-+    return false;
-+
-+  if (GET_CODE (x) != SYMBOL_REF)
-+    return false;
-+
-+  return SYMBOL_REF_TLS_MODEL (x) != 0;
-+}
 +
 +/* Helper for m68k_tls_referenced_p.  */
 +
@@ -1414,6 +1385,18 @@

 #define REG_OK_FOR_BASE_P(X) \
   m68k_legitimate_base_reg_p (X, REG_STRICT_P)
+@@ -777,7 +778,10 @@ __transfer_from_trampoline ()                                     \
+ #define COPY_ONCE(Y) if (!copied) { Y = copy_rtx (Y); copied = ch = 1; }
+ #define LEGITIMIZE_ADDRESS(X,OLDX,MODE,WIN)   \
+ { register int ch = (X) != (OLDX);                                    \
+-  if (GET_CODE (X) == PLUS)                                           \
++  if (HAVE_AS_TLS && (GET_CODE (X) == SYMBOL_REF) &&                  \
++      (SYMBOL_REF_TLS_MODEL (X) != 0))                                        \
++    m68k_legitimize_tls_address (X);                                  \
++  else if (GET_CODE (X) == PLUS)                                      \
+     { int copied = 0;                                                 \
+       if (GET_CODE (XEXP (X, 0)) == MULT)                             \
+       { COPY_ONCE (X); XEXP (X, 0) = force_operand (XEXP (X, 0), 0);} \
 @@ -974,6 +975,9 @@ do { if (cc_prev_status.flags & CC_IN_68
   assemble_name ((FILE), (NAME)),             \
   fprintf ((FILE), ",%u\n", (int)(ROUNDED)))
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux