On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 13:26, Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:16, Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Warning: it may be rubbish, it may just be a hack which appeared to
work for me the last time I tried, on a particular address range of a
particular set of configurations of a particular set of architectures
(x86_32, x86_64, powerpc64). I've never thought it through enough to
consider submitting, but it _might_ contain something useful for you
to factor into your own efforts.
Sorry for chucking it over the wall to you in this way, but I guess
that's better than just sitting quietly on it for a few more years.
Certainly-Not-Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I think that gives a good idea of the status of this patch:
I'm not making any policy decisions here or submitting to any tree.
OK, that was my understanding, too.
But I thought it would hurt to verify. You never know who's gonna take
your patch and (try to) sneak it in ;-)
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
