No. Byte would be addqb.
I think you're right, I am not familiar coldfire assembly and instruction. I just touched it no long time. addqb instruction is not supported on coldfire platform. Which better way to replace it? I tried to use addql, but it proves that it's incorrect. I guess my patch could be better way to replace it now. Regards, Lanttor ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> *Sent:* 07/02/2009 5:05:59 PM +0800 *To:* Lanttor <lanttor.guo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> *CC:* linux-m68k@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, uClinux development list <uclinux-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> *Subject:* Interrupt issue on m68k platform and some fix
Lanttor <lanttor.guo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:So this code sets value 1 to the second byte of preempt_count field.No. Byte would be addqb. Andreas.
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
