Re: current 2.6 on Q950

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

The patches that I sent were merged into that release (2.6.29). So X11
works again, and mac_esp supports both SCSI busses on the quadras 9x0.


very cool, I extra checked and I still had the option to disable the scsi BUS in penguin.
Indeed I see:
[42949375.000000] mac_esp: using PDMA for controller 0
[42949378.080000] mac_esp: using PDMA for controller 1

My external MO disk doesn't get recognized though. I'll check that it still works on MacOS though.

X11 doesn't work for me, but I'll write separately about that.

I haven't heard anything more since you raised it on this mailing list
back in October. I never implemented the workaround that was discussed at
the time because I have more pressing bugs on my todo list, and because
I'd like to try and figure out how the hardware works before resorting to
workarounds...

Oh sure, also because once a workaround gets implemented, the motivation to do the real thing gets even less. The real access would be very good together with EMILE.


and that hard disk performance is still bad.

If dmesg says that PDMA is in use on scsi0 and scsi1, then I'm afraid it
probably isn't going to get any faster. But performance should be
comparable with NetBSD if not MacOS (though I never benchmarked either).


I just run bonnie:

Version 1.03e ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random- -Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks-- Machine Size K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP elendil 120M 113 78 1323 72 754 66 123 89 1607 73 99.3 35 ------Sequential Create------ --------Random Create-------- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- -Create-- --Read--- -Delete-- files /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP /sec %CP 16 27 88 5272 99 1450 99 30 93 6229 99 105 78

char operations are very slow (cpu bound? some libraries are inefficient?) , but thi could have other reasons. I see that block write is 1323 K/s and bloc reaad is 1.6, that is slower than the mac, but not abysmal, I don't remember this exact configuration, but 2-3 M/s were average for those old macs. IIRC the Q950 was a bit faster than the others on the internal chain, but it is clear there that the driver performs reasonably now.

Riccardo

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux