Paul Mundt wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 04:20:06PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
Hi Kosako,
KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
I guess nobody don't test m68knommu at all last three month.
Do we still need to maintain this architecture?
Yes, we do.
Any effort to get m68knommu folded in to m68k proper? This might help
Some :-)
The header merge is the first step.
with some of your bitrot issues.. And likely less work to do in
supporting those m68knommu parts that ship with MMUs ;-)
m68knommu is the only one of the mmu/nommu variants left that ships in
its own architecture directory rather than being folded in to its parent.
It would be good to get rid of it one of these days.
Yep. I think we will likely make some progress on this over
the next few months...
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx
SnapGear, a McAfee Company PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
825 Stanley St, FAX: +61 7 3891 3630
Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
