Petr Stehlik <pstehlik@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Geert Uytterhoeven has a patch in his POSTPONED queue that is supposed
to fix Atari FAT. I can't speak to whether it works or why it's
postponed, but it seems to compile.
I see. Although I don't know the patch, I'd like to add this part to
Geert's patch if possible. And when the patch can be posted, we can
re-add this part again.
Geert, what do you think?
It's in POSTPONED state because nobody speaks up for/against it.
Personally, I don't know how much it is (still) needed...
But a few years ago somebody contacted me that he used it succesfully
on PA-RISC and i386 ;-)
BTW, the patch is
http://linux-m68k-cvs.ubb.ca/~geert/linux-m68k-patches-2.6/POSTPONED/134-atari-fat.diff
Atari people, I think now is the time to let it live or die...
The patch looks good, how can I let it live?
Could you test whether it works well? If it works fine, I'll merge and
clean it up. If it doesn't work, please fix it.
BTW,
+ if (sbi->fat_bits != 32 && total_clusters+2 > sbi->
+ fat_length*SECTOR_SIZE*8/sbi->fat_bits)
+ sbi->fat_bits = 12;
SECTOR_SIZE should be sb->s_blocksize? Or Atari doesn't support the
sector size other than 512 bytes?
Thanks.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
