Re: [PATCH] init - fix building bug and potential buffer overflow

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Could you please make an update to the patch? I can make it only
tomorrow evening (ie not that fast)

On 5/15/08, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2008, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
[Andrew Morton - Thu, May 15, 2008 at 10:58:03AM -0700]
| On Wed, 14 May 2008 19:44:02 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
|
| > This patch does fix build bug on m68k wich does not have strncat in
straight way.
| >
| > What is more important - my previous patch
| >
| > commit e662e1cfd434aa234b72fbc781f1d70211cb785b
| > Author: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
| > Date:   Mon May 12 14:02:22 2008 -0700
| >
| >     init: don't lose initcall return values
| >
| > has introduced potential buffer overflow by wrong calculation
| > of string accumulator size.
| >
| > Many thanks Andreas Schwab and Geert Uytterhoeven for helping
| > to catch and fix the bug.
| >
| > Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
| > ---
| >
| > Index: linux-2.6.git/init/main.c
| > ===================================================================
| > --- linux-2.6.git.orig/init/main.c	2008-05-14 17:55:10.000000000 +0400
| > +++ linux-2.6.git/init/main.c	2008-05-14 19:11:18.000000000 +0400
| > @@ -702,7 +702,7 @@ static void __init do_initcalls(void)
| >
| >  	for (call = __initcall_start; call < __initcall_end; call++) {
| >  		ktime_t t0, t1, delta;
| > -		char msgbuf[40];
| > +		char msgbuf[64];
| >  		int result;
| >
| >  		if (initcall_debug) {
| > @@ -729,11 +729,11 @@ static void __init do_initcalls(void)
| >  			sprintf(msgbuf, "error code %d ", result);
| >
| >  		if (preempt_count() != count) {
| > -			strncat(msgbuf, "preemption imbalance ", sizeof(msgbuf));
| > +			strcat(msgbuf, "preemption imbalance ");
| >  			preempt_count() = count;
| >  		}
| >  		if (irqs_disabled()) {
| > -			strncat(msgbuf, "disabled interrupts ", sizeof(msgbuf));
| > +			strcat(msgbuf, "disabled interrupts ");
| >  			local_irq_enable();
| >  		}
| >  		if (msgbuf[0]) {
|
| umm, why can't m68k call strncat() from init/main.c??
|

there some problem with headers iirc, we have to declare it first or
use some gcc option (as Adrian suggested). Actually I would prefer to use

gcc turns the strncat() into an implicit call to strlen() and some form
of expanded memcpy(). E.g.


	if (preempt_count() != count) {
		strncat(msgbuf, "preemption imbalance ", sizeof(msgbuf));
		preempt_count() = count;
	}

becomes

        cmp.l 884(%a2),%d6      | <variable>.thread.info.preempt_count,
count
        jeq .L61        |
        move.l %d7,-(%sp)       | tmp76,
        jbsr strlen     |
        addq.l #4,%sp   |,
        move.l %d7,%a0  | tmp76, tmp80
        add.l %d0,%a0   |, tmp80
        move.l #1886545253,(%a0)+       |,
        move.l #1836086377,(%a0)+       |,
        move.l #1869488233,(%a0)+       |,
        move.l #1835164012,(%a0)+       |,
        move.l #1634624357,(%a0)+       |,
        move.w #8192,(%a0)      |,* D.28541
        move.l %d6,884(%a2)     | count,
<variable>.thread.info.preempt_count
.L61:

All other explicit calls to strlen() are inlined, as per
include/asm-m68k/string.h.

strlcat there but it seems it would fail to build too. Originally I've
messed
strlcat with strncat :(

Actually it build and runs fine after s/strncat/strlcat/...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

						Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 --
geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like
that.
							    -- Linus Torvalds

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Video for Linux]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux S/390]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux