On Sat, 5 Apr 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Commit aa02ad67d9b308290fde390682cd039b29f7ab85
"ext4: Add ext4_find_next_bit()" causes the following regression:
<-- snip -->
...
CC [M] fs/ext4/mballoc.o
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/fs/ext4/mballoc.c: In function 'mb_find_next_bit':
/home/bunk/linux/kernel-2.6/git/linux-2.6/fs/ext4/mballoc.c:696: error: implicit declaration of function 'generic_find_next_le_bit'
make[3]: *** [fs/ext4/mballoc.o] Error 1
<-- snip -->
Known issue. The ext4 developers added a #define (with a different name than in
the patch comment) in the commit below, but forgot to make sure
generic_find_next_le_bit() is actually available.
commit aa02ad67d9b308290fde390682cd039b29f7ab85
Author: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon Jan 28 23:58:27 2008 -0500
ext4: Add ext4_find_next_bit()
This function is used by the ext4 multi block allocator patches.
Also add generic_find_next_le_bit
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
diff --git a/include/asm-m68k/bitops.h b/include/asm-m68k/bitops.h
index 2976b5d..83d1f28 100644
--- a/include/asm-m68k/bitops.h
+++ b/include/asm-m68k/bitops.h
@@ -410,6 +410,8 @@ static inline int ext2_find_next_zero_bit(const void *vaddr
res = ext2_find_first_zero_bit (p, size - 32 * (p - addr));
return (p - addr) * 32 + res;
}
+#define ext2_find_next_bit(addr, size, off) \
+ generic_find_next_le_bit((unsigned long *)(addr), (size), (off))
#endif /* __KERNEL__ */
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
