On Saturday 13 October 2007 20:38:43 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2007, Larry Finger wrote:
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
linux/drivers/net/wireless/b43/pio.h: In function 'b43_pio_write':
linux/drivers/net/wireless/b43/pio.h:89: error: implicit declaration of function 'mmiowb'
linux/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy.c: In function 'b43_phy_write':
linux/drivers/net/wireless/b43/phy.c:301: error: implicit declaration of function 'mmiowb'
linuxdrivers/net/wireless/b43/sysfs.c: In function 'b43_attr_interfmode_store':
linuxdrivers/net/wireless/b43/sysfs.c:147: error: implicit declaration of function 'mmiowb'
From the distribution list for this E-mail, I presume this error occurred for m68k. Is this correct?
That's correct.
If so, I will probably need to prepare a similar patch for b43legacy.
I had no problems compiling b43legacy on m68k, though. Probably
<linux/io.h> was included through some other include file.
Of course it's safer to always #include <linux/io.h> when using I/O.
During linking, I did get a bunch of `undefined reference to `dma_*''
errors, with both b43 and b43legacy (and a few other drivers). Probably
they need to depend on HAS_DMA.
I'll post separate patches for those after I've sorted them out.
We could make the b43 and b43legacy DMA engine code depend on HAS_DMA
then. So it can still be compiled with PIO. (Though, I don't know if
anybody would put such a card into a machine without DMA, anyway).
The DMA engine code is a seperate kconfig option.
--
Greetings Michael.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-m68k" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
